Language:
The Arms of the Militiaman extend to all weapons of the modern soldier portable by a single man.
Does this work for you? Should it be:
The Arms of the Militiaman extend to all anti-personnel weapons of the modern soldier portable by a single man.
Where do we draw the line? Should you have a shoulder-fired AA missile system if you can afford it? What about a fully weaponized tank? F-111 with full weapon suite? C-4? Landmines?
The question will be one of the first to come up from challengers who get a copy of our III to Congress in their hands. What is our position?
Kerodin
III
III
