As most of you know, today was Day One of SCOTUS arguments regarding the "Constitutionality" of FedGov to mandate purchases by Citizens from the market.
DC is abuzz because in legal-speak, apparently a few hurdles were brushed aside today and tomorrow the Court will begin actually getting to the merits of the case.
Where do you stand? I do not care if you think it is Constitutional or not - my question relates to timeline, course, speed and the size of the crater.
Are you in the camp that SCOTUS should call it "Constitutional" so that our impact debris field is deeper, the same premise as simply voting for President Obama in November, so we can clear away the facade and get to the red meat of whatever comes next?
I call that the Let it burn to the ground Battle Plan.
Or, do you hope SCOTUS derails ObamaCare...
Just curious.
Personally - any nine men who will rule my life had better be carrying heavy.
Kerodin
III
